What the hell is the deal with this? I don’t like this! Do women actually consider what a shirt will look like with a raging case of titty hard-ons? What is the point of this? With nipple-less mannequins is anyone thinking “I like that shirt but I just can’t imagine what it would look like if my nipples were erect”? Also, I’m not gonna lie, sometimes I find myself strangely attracted to these weird faceless bodies and it makes me uncomfortable. It’s like Jessica Rabbit, I know she is a cartoon but she is hot and I can’t look away. How does that dress even stay on? Would her and Roger’s babies come out as rabbits or humans or a weird blend? Would she have a litter or just one? Maybe a litter of humans but only one rabbit? That would be cool. Remember those animated talking bullets in the movie, that’s my favourite part. That and the part when Doc Brown gets run over by the steamroller and then inflates himself (that sounds dirty) and then his eyes turn into daggers. That part is scary. The Roger Rabbit game for original Nintendo was good, really good. You had to tell jokes to the weasels to get away from them and you could drive around in Benny the Cab. The music was great too and you could walk around slapping anybody you wanted.
ANYWAYS, these mannequins definitely get a second glance, maybe that is the point, but I’m a man and not gonna purchase women’s clothes so really what is the point? And why are the nipples so HUGE?
This really begs another question, why don’t male mannequins have huge erections? Then I could imagine what those pants would look like while trying to conceal an erection. There could be different styles of mannequins, full on, half chub, limp – imagine Michelangelo’s David with a pair of Calvins on (thank you interwebs).